-->

Pros and Cons of Programmatic Advertising

In this clip from a Streaming Media Connect 2025 debate, Will Programmatic Advertising Overtake Brand/Direct in 2025?, Philo Head of Advertising Partnerships Aulden Kaye Yi discusses the future of programmatic advertising, emphasizing that it is an activation method rather than a type of advertising. Invited to make the case for programmatic by moderator Alan Wolk of TVREV, in spite of frequently raised concerns like brand safety, Yi says, “We've built the entire Philo ads business on programmatic. We make all of our inventory available programmatically. We've made it 100 percent addressable and easy to access because we heard from the market that they wanted to be able to scale campaigns and reach their relevant audiences across the CTV ecosystem."

When It Comes to Programmatic and Brand Advertising, It’s Yes and, Not Either/Or

Yi goes on to argue that the premise of the debate—that programmatic is engaged in some sort of pitched battle with brand for CTV advertising supremacy—“presents a fundamental misunderstanding of what programmatic means.” Yi clarifies that programmatic and performance are not interchangeable, and both brand and direct buys can be executed programmatically based on campaign goals. What’s more, programmatic advertising allows for holistic campaign management and measurement, offering flexibility and scalability across the CTV ecosystem.

"Programmatic is an activation method," she says. "It's not a type of advertising. Programmatic and performance are not interchangeable terms. I don't think brand and direct are interchangeable terms. You can execute both types of buys programmatically, and the setup will be determined by the campaign goals."

As a result, she continues, "you're going to choose measurement vendors that align with your campaign goals. And maybe that's brand surveys or A/B geo testing with brand awareness, and maybe that's lower-funnel, different types of measurement for those types of KPIs. Even funneling PG [programmatic guarantee] campaigns—based on direct I/Os—through programmatic platforms has the benefit of holistic campaign management and measurement."

Yi also addresses misconceptions about programmatic being automatic, highlighting the importance of relationships and brand safety measures. “Just because you're executing a campaign programmatically does not mean that you are hands-off. There are still a ton of relationships that are driving the business. Most TV is transacting via deals, not the open exchange. So it doesn't have to be the wild west. You can set up one-to-one PMPs with the publishers you know you want to be working with—publishers who have authenticated audiences—leverage tools like Ads.txt to make sure that you're buying along approved paths from a brand safety perspective, and really understand where your dollars are going. And then the third big point I would make is that programmatic TV advertising is TV advertising. So when you're talking about the concept of effectiveness, audiences don't know when they're watching an ad, whether it was bought programmatically or not.”

Insisting that “advertising on CTV is advertising on CTV,” and that it reaches the viewer the same way and succeeds or fails on its own merits, regardless of how it was purchased, Yi concludes, "Programmatic is really about reaching audiences in the most effective way, scaling that across fragmented premium publisher landscape, being able to target your relevant audiences, measure holistically, make changes, and optimize a campaign in a more flexible way. So broadly, I think that we have seen the market shifting towards programmatic. We are going to continue to see that shift as buyers are seeking that greater ease of scaling and the transparency and the optimization and the flexibility.”

Is It Safe?

Vevo VP, US Sales Melissa Sofo chimes in to press Yi on the brand safety issue that is the persistent knock on the programmatic approach. “From a transparency perspective, when you bind and bundle content for an advertiser who don't know exactly what they’re aligning with, I understand that there are measures that you take for brand safety, but can you just elaborate a little bit on how you can become more accountable to that brand safety and to identifying where an advertiser's ad is running and what they’re aligning against?”

“Because we are a distributor,” Yi responds, “there are some limitations to what we can share. We're not sharing show-level data. We're selling against an audience, not a particular piece of content. With that said, there is a lot of data that we can share around the genre, around the rating. So if there are certain categories of content that an advertiser doesn't want to be near news, for example, there are ways for us to implement that where you can guarantee that they're not going to air next to the type of content they want without needing to be quite as specific as, ‘You’re going to be in this show and this show, and not that show,' but certainly [we can tell them you'll be] putting yourself in an environment where it is relevant and appropriate content for whoever that advertiser is and what their needs are.”

Fremantle SVP Global FAST Channels Laura Florence counters for Team Brand/Direct with a question on "the amount of content that is bundled into these genre and rating offerings. Let's take the musicals category as an example. So you've got Wicked--premium, new, awesome--and we can't tell them that it's there. And then you've got Cats, which is like 2% on Rotten Tomatoes, and then you've got Showgirls. How does an advertiser know what's premium and not when you're selling against genres and audiences?

Yi argues that what kind of ratings the content has received, and any perceived quality gap based on that differential between Rotten Tomatoes scores doesn’t matter, because premium content is defined by audience engagement rather than ratings. 

"First of all, we're a virtual MVPD, so the content is all content that advertisers are familiar with and probably buying in a linear way. It's Warner Brothers Discovery, it's Paramount, it's A+E, it's AMC, it's Hallmark. I would argue that all of that is premium. The other thing that I would say is premium is really about what the audience wants to be watching. Maybe it got 2% on Rotten Tomatoes, but if someone wants to watch Cats and they're engaged in that content and you can serve them an ad in that environment and there's not a brand safety concern, is there a concern then that it didn't get two thumbs up or the best Rotten Tomatoes score? 'Premium' is about hitting people in the moment where they're watching the content that they want to be watching and are receptive to your message."

Streaming Covers
Free
for qualified subscribers
Subscribe Now Current Issue Past Issues
Related Articles

Direct vs. Programmatic for Improving FAST Fill Rates and CPMs

FAST and AVOD are struggling to fill inventory and CPMs are sagging in much of the CTV world. Is programmatic the problem or the solution? Is brand or direct advertising better equipped to turn the tide? Would a hybrid strategy work better? Fremantle's Laura Florence, Roku's Charlie Goodman, Philo's Aulden Kaye Yi, and Vevo's Melissa Sofo debate the best solutions to free streaming's fill and pricing problems in this clip from Streaming Media Connect 2025.

How to Move FAST Forward: Six Action Items for Free Streaming's Future

At Streaming Media Connect 2025 I moderated a session called "FAST Forward" with panelists from A+E, Fremantle, Plex, and Revry. We looked at how FAST platforms and providers can better serve their channel customers. Drawing on insights from the panel, here are six key action items to move our industry forward.

What's Next for CTV Advertising: Comscore's State of Programmatic 2025 Survey

Comscore's State of Programmatic 2025 offers survey-based data that reveals where advertising budgets are going in 2025 (think CTV), how quickly marketers are turning to cookie-free (48% cookie-free by the end of 2025), and what CTV ads do well (branding) and not so well (performance). It's a free download and well worth your time to retrieve and digest.

Privacy and Consent Concerns for CTV Ad-Targeting

Leveraging viewer data to identify and target users is the sine qua non of CTV advertising, and the closer channels can bring advertisers to the viewers, the more revenue they can bring to their platform. But it's always a balancing act when it comes to protecting the privacy of their audience, as Revry CEO/Co-Founder Damian Pelliccione and Warner Bros. Discovery Product Manager Dan Trotta explain in this candid conversation from Streaming Media Connect with Advertiser Perceptions' Erin Firneno, although the privacy and consent issues and strategies for addressing them differ dramatically between indie networks like Revry and behemoths like WBD.

What Kind of Audience Data Are CTV Advertisers Looking For?

Content is king, but when it comes to monetizing CTV advertising campaigns and maximizing their effectiveness, it's secondary to the data and metrics that guarantee that their marketing efforts are connecting with the right audiences. In this clip from Streaming Media Connect 2024, Warner Bros. Discovery's Daniel Trotta, Revry's Damian Pelliccione, and Advertising Perceptions' Erin Firneno discuss real-world examples of how CTV content providers and aggregators can provide specific analytics and metrics that deliver real value to their advertising partners.

Why Advertisers Like Contextual Targeting

One of the arguments in favor of contextual advertising is that it makes it easier to match the tone and sentiment of the content it accompanies instead of thoughtlessly throwing an ad for a dating app into the middle of a tragic news report. What are its other advantages that draw advertisers to it? How does the current state of contextual ads deliver on its promise and where does it fall short? TVREV's Alan Wolk, Vevo's Julie Triolo, Estrella MediaCo's Christina Chung, and Advertiser Perceptions' Erin Firneno discuss in this clip from Streaming Media Connect 2024.

The State of Ad-ID in CTV and Streaming

Launched by the IAB Tech Lab's Advanced Television Systems Committee and designed to "provide standardized identity management for ad creatives" through metadata, Ad-ID is designed to bring streaming ad insertion—particularly for live events—out of "the Wild West," according to Paramount's Jarred Wilichinsky, and to stop, among other things, the mindless repetition of ads that drags down so many streaming experiences. Wilichinsky, Roku's Charlie Goodman, JWP's David Palomento, Akamai's Peter Chave, and Infinitive's C.J. Leonard weigh in on Ad-ID's progress and its potential impact on the streaming ecosystem in this discussion with Reality Software's Nadine Krefetz at Streaming Media NYC.